Search for: "Rogers v. Sullivan" Results 41 - 60 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am by Amy Howe
Sullivan, Cass Sunstein urges readers to “pay close attention to the dark side” of the case. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:03 am by David Post
I’m hopeful that this latest decision — the second time (see Sullivan v Government of USA [2012] EWHC 1680 (Admin)) that a U.K. court has found that U.S. civil commitment procedures violate basic human rights — though from a foreign court interpreting foreign law, will add to the weight and persuasiveness of the constitutional challenges to these schemes. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:29 am by Steve Davies
Cir., 8/17/2012) Opinion, and Judge Emmet Sullivan’s decision in the district court. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am by Wells C. Bennett
Circuit’s Guantanamo detention saga: Suleiman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
 Sullivan and from the Seventh Circuit's precedent in Backpage.com, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bounced around the circuit courts in search for some kind of coherence; Rogers v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Yahoo News, Roger Parloff reports that the court’s decision whether to “wade into the inherently political quagmire of district mapping” in Gill v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:25 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
When I was invited to give a speech in Florida this month as part of a fiftieth anniversary commemoration of the decision in Gideon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
This was approved by Sullivan CJ in the Irish Supreme Court in Sinclair v Gogarty [1937] IR 377 (see also Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 ILTR 134 (Murnaghan J); Connolly v Radio Telifís Eireann [1991] 2 IR 446 (Carroll J); Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) (Kelly J)); and it represents the law in Australia (Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [2006] HCA 46 (28 September… [read post]