Search for: "Rogers v. Sullivan"
Results 81 - 100
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail on… [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:08 am
In Abrams v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 1:37 pm
There are some older cases about trademark - for my purposes, the key ones are Friedman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
Sullivan of the U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 5:52 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:31 am
.), on Friday, March 6, 2020 Tags: Extraterritoriality, Foreign issuers, International governance, Liability standards, Morrison v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Sullivan; no defense bar as such when the case came down, when such cases were dealt w/by private detectives and not 1A lawyers—thought [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
Kathleen Sullivan.) [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
Roger, 311 F. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
Frase, Richard S. and Julian V. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
Africa & the Future of International Criminal Law": Vernice Guthrie-Sullivan, ABA Africa Law Institute; Simone Monasebian, U.N. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
”[21] Under this test, Ginger Rogers and the estate of Fred Astaire could not prevent a filmmaker from using the title “Ginger and Fred” in a fictional film because the use was “clearly related to the content of the movie and is not a disguised advertisement for the sale of goods or services or a collateral commercial product. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
But that’s true of many of these rules—context might lead to implicit exceptions v. reading the rules strictly.1:50 – 2:35 pm: Content Moderation and Law EnforcementClara Tsao, Chief Technology Officer, Interagency Countering Violent Extremism Task Force, Department of Homeland SecurityJacob Rogers, Wikimedia Foundation: works w/LE requests received by Foundation. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
, 14 Roger Williams U. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
, 14 Roger Williams U. [read post]
