Search for: "Rogers v. United States Lines" Results 1 - 20 of 368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Immigration Prof
United States, which enjoined the Obama administration's expanded deferred action program. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Kali Borkoski
United States ,” which will lead you to all the posts. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Under that line of reasoning, replies Judge Rogers, we would be required to interpret “United States” as meaning more than solely the executive branch. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:53 pm
My paper discusses last term's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 3:09 pm
Audrey Rogers, Pace University School of Law, has published "Protecting Children on the Internet: Mission Impossible? [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:10 am
Twelve year old prior conviction was inadmissible simply because probation period fell within ten years under FRE 609(b); circuit notes open issue on whether a revocation of probation or parole on the underlying conviction may stop the ten-year clock, in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:49 am
Forty-one days after Gene's lecture, CAAF would issue its opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  It likewise uses “names and insignia of contemporary forces such as the National Security Agency, the United States Marine Corps, and the United States Air Force. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
When Chief Justice of the United States, Taney wrote the opinion for the Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]