Search for: "Rojas v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
”RM: There has been a lot of discussion about the consultant corollary over the past few years, ever since the Ninth Circuit considered Rojas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
At the hearing, the parties argued the import of the recent decision of State of Missouri v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am
Rojas. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
United States and Palomares v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am
New Relists Donziger v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
United States, Shaw v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
But that provides a weapon to the great enemy of the Cuban state--the Americans. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Valdez v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:24 pm
Gómez, Gilberto Guerrero-Rocca, Nicolás Vassallo, María Gabriela De Abreu Negrón, Karen Longaric, & Fabián Villeda Corona, Revisión de laudos arbitrales de inversión 2020: 2º Encuentro Anual (Santiago de Chile, 07-08/06/2021) Lucas Carlos Lima, As medidas cautelares da Corte Internacional de Justiça no caso Ucrânia e Federação Russa Eshan Dauhoo, The Challenges faced by Women Legal Academics (Panel Discussion) … [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
The State may not be held liable for the actions of a state-employed judge that are cloaked with judicial immunity (Montesano v State of New York, 11 AD3d 436 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
The State may not be held liable for the actions of a state-employed judge that are cloaked with judicial immunity (Montesano v State of New York, 11 AD3d 436 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am
See Rojas v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:48 pm
Rojas, 184 A.D.3d 761, 762, 124 N.Y.S.3d 246). [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
Both states require mutual consent. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:47 am
Winner’s conduct did not rise to the level of frivolous within the definition of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (see Rojas v Hazzard, 171 AD3d 819, 820; Deutsche Bank Natl. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Hurn v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
The gardener's relatives sue Danielle for wrongful death, claiming her actions created a risk of injury by foreseeably enraging Craig.[5] And a version of this problem arises with the "duty to retreat" that thirteen states still recognize in self-defense cases, and the more general "duty to comply with a negative demand" that seven states still recognize. [read post]
