Search for: "Rolph v. Rolph"
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2007, 9:45 pm
Rolph has been facing a challenge from lawyers for Omar Ahmed Khadr, the first detainee involved in a case before the CMCR (U.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:43 pm
Both rely on Georgia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
NMCCA released its en banc reconsideration opinion today in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 11:42 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 7:00 am
; QuickFile4Outlook; Risky PDF Printing Tip; WordPerfect: You Rule; Multiple Monitors Tip By Daniel Fennick, Stephen Lambeth, Ernest Marquez, Pam Rolph, & Sanjay Singh In this issue of Answers to Questions, Stephen Lambeth explains why he would want to see a Microsoft branded PC, Sanjay Singh explains how QuickFile 4 Outlook works and why, Pam Rolph suggests a quick solution for anyone who can't print a large PDF file (use at your own risk), Daniel Fennick claims to… [read post]
3 May 2019, 9:30 pm
The Historical Society of the New York Courts has posted an excerpt from Paul McGrath's "People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
LEXIS 26909, Feb 2, 2017), and dismissed an inmate's complaint regarding his desire to be baptized by a Jehovah's Witness.In Rolph v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 2:38 pm
Senior Judge Rolph dissented. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm
When David Rolph brought the case to my attention, I was midway through writing an article dealing with the same set of facts. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
Writing before the decision of the Court of Appeal in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2020] EWCA Civ 611, Professor David Rolph commented in his illuminating chapter on the case in Landmark Cases in Defamation Law (Hart Publishing, 2019), ‘the policy of the law has decisively changed. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm
This piece does not suggest that the courts themselves are racist, but that the framework of defamation law is one-sided; Greenstein v Campaign Against Anti-Semitism [2020] EWHC 2951; Tilbrook v Parr [2012] EWHC 1946 (QB); Hays v Hartley [2010] EWHC 1068 (QB) [3] David Rolph, ‘Racial Discrimination Law as a Means of Protecting Collective Reputations’ in Matthew Rimmer (ed), Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward… [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Harmon, pp.226-229 Gene Cartels: Biotech Patents in The Age of Free Trade, By Luigi Palombi, Reviewed by David Koepsell, pp.230-231 Reputation, Celebrity and Defamation Law, By David Rolph, Reviewed by Lawrence McNamara, pp.232-235 Law, Mind And Brain, By Michael Freeman and Oliver R Goodenough (eds), Reviewed by Dennis Patterson, pp.236-241 [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jacob Schulz sat down with Benjamin Haddad to discuss the factors underlying the French reaction to the AUKUS security pact and its implications for the future of transatlantic relations and U.S. strategy: Timothy Edgar discussed how judges should follow the technical approach laid out in Van Buren v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 1:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:13 pm
But that's what United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
See Hervey v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:49 pm
Rolph,Arthur F. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:58 am
Celebrity’s fluidity, Rolph suggests, may be inconsistent with defamation law’s understanding of the stolidity of reputation. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Research and Resources “An appetite for Suppression: Non-Publication Orders, Open Justice and the Protection of Privacy”, Miiko A Kumar and David Rolph, SSRN. [read post]
