Search for: "Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn"
Results 101 - 120
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 4:39 am
A complaint containing factual claims that are flatly contradicted by documentary evidence should be dismissed (Well v Rambam, 300 AD2d 580, 581 [2002]; Kenneth R. v Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, 229 AD2d 159, 162 [1997], cert. denied 522 US 967 [1997]). [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 7:03 am
"); Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 10:56 am
Supreme Court ruled in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
Where a request for discovery from a nonparty is challenged solely on the ground that it exceeds the permissible scope of matters material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of the action, a motion to quash is properly denied if that threshold requirement is satisfied (see Samide v Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, 16 AD3d 482, 483, [2d Dept. 2005) or properly Page 3 granted if the discovery sought is not material and necessary (see Mendelovitz v… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:15 pm
Danville Christian and Cameron filed an emergency request at the Supreme Court on Monday afternoon, telling the justices that the 6th Circuit’s “application of the Free Exercise Clause is ‘demonstrably wrong’ in light of” the Supreme Court’s ruling last week in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm
” Kenneth R. v Roman catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, 229 A.D.2d 159, 161 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept, 1997) Indeed, Hawaii recognizes an action for negligent supervision. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
Newsom (2021), which followed up on Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:53 am
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v Cuomo (2020), the Supreme Court of the United States determined that an executive order that imposed restrictions on attendance at religious services in certain areas in response to the COVID-19 pandemic would likely not be considered neutral and of general applicability and thus must satisfy strict scrutiny. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
Such beard mandates are usually characteristic of Muslims, Jews, and Sikhs.[8] Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:01 pm
Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
It has been an interpretation of the Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendments that have told us what cannot be illegal (when a right is not enumerated against the federal government).Justice Gorsuch a few weeks ago wrote a concurring opinion in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm
Where a request for discovery from a nonparty is challenged solely on the ground that it exceeds the permissible scope of matters material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of the action, a motion to quash is properly denied if that threshold requirement is satisfied (see Samide v Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, 16 AD3d 482, 483, [2d Dept. 2005) or properly Page 3 granted if the discovery sought is not material and necessary (see Mendelovitz v Cohen,… [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
In the Ninth Circuit's view, the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 5:12 am
., after Lesley University) raised this question to me, explaining that he read commentary in a credible media outlet about Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s “deciding” vote in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:41 am
Citing its previous decision in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 1:24 am
That's what Mayer Brown's Philip Lacovara did on behalf of his client, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Bridgeport, Conn., in seeking to delay release of thousands of pages of documents in sexual abuse cases brought against priests. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm
Mastro also successfully represented the Roman Catholic of Brooklyn against (almost former-)Governor Cuomo. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
It is black-letter law, as the Supreme Court held in 2020 in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm
.'s Mem. at 17 (citing Illinois and California COVID-19 regulations that include religious exemption language); see also Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn (finding tailoring requirement unsatisfied where, inter alia, the challenged restriction was "much tighter than those adopted by many other jurisdictions hard-hit by the pandemic"). [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:04 am
(There is a related pending case, The Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
