Search for: "Rome v Rome"
Results 1 - 20
of 985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2009, 2:46 pm
Related posts:Lecture: “Rome I: The Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations” “Rome I: The Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations” Date: 26th...Seminar: Substance and Procedure in the Law Applicable to Torts - Harding v Wealands & the Rome II Regulation Substance and Procedure in the Law Applicable to Torts –...Rome I Regulation - A Dangerous Proposal? [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:21 pm
The Court of Justice in its recent judgment of 6 October 2009, ICF v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
As such, they should not face the difficulties and – bluntly put – resistance that, instead, they have been encountering across multiple national courts.The recent and somewhat ‘twin’ decisions of the Rome Court of First Instance in RTI v Vimeo (decision 5700/2023) and RTI v V Kontakte (decision 14531/2023) are examples of both a misunderstanding and misapplication of CJEU case law, notably the 2021 judgment in YouTube, C-682/18 and… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:04 am
Neave and others v Court of Rome, Italy: [2012] EWHC 358 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 46 “In the context of the Extradition Act 2003 a person who was no more than a suspect was not an accused person. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:27 am
Miller filed suit — Miller v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:30 pm
The case, lodged on 2 April 2008, is pending under C-133/08, ICF (Intercontainer Interfrigo (ICF) SC v [...] [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 1:53 am
V. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 10:47 am
(Switzerland) v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:21 am
Katsas, V. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:47 pm
From the Legal Intelligencer, via Am Law Daily (and also a commenter): Blank Rome has entered into a $20 million agreement with the trustee of a former client that is now in bankruptcy to settle a complaint that alleged breach of fiduciary duty, professional malpractice and breach of contract claims against the firm.The settlement, reached in the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court case Miller v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 12:48 pm
Today, the English High Court in Owen v Galgey [2020] EHWC 3546 (QB) delivered a thorough and interesting decision on Article 4(3) of Rome II Regulation, which is the general escape clause for Rome II. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
In Jacobs v Motor Insurers Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), Mr Justice Owen applied Rome II’s provisions to reach the conclusion that the compensation to be paid by the MIB (acting as the UK’s compensation body under the Fourth Motor Insurance Directive) to the claimant as a result of an accident in a Spanish shopping centre car park in December 2007 in which the other driver was German (and uninsured) should be assessed in accordance with Spanish law, as the law of the… [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
In Deo Antoine Homawoo v GMF Assurance SA and others [2010] EWHC 1941 (QB) the High Court had to determine, as a preliminary issue, whether Rome II (a regime for determining the law applicable to non-contractual obligations) applied to Homawoo's claim against GMF Assurance, a French insurance company, for damages for personal injury caused to Homawoo during a road traffic accident in France. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
In the case of CO2 reduction claims, like Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am
Among other things, in its 2016 judgment in RTI v Break Media [noted here], the Rome court answered the first question above in the affirmative, and also tried to clarify when a hosting provider loses its safe harbour protection. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:06 am
Seminar: Substance and Procedure in the Law Applicable to Torts – Harding v Wealands & the Rome II Regulation Substance and Procedure in the Law Applicable to Torts –... [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:55 am
Seminar: Substance and Procedure in the Law Applicable to Torts – Harding v Wealands & the Rome II Regulation Substance and Procedure in the Law Applicable to Torts –... [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
Rome Court of First instances confirms once again that takedown requests do not need to include URLs
18 Jul 2016, 6:56 am
The case is: Tribunale di Roma, Reti Televisive Italiane spa v Megavideo Ltd, decision 14279/2016, published 15/07/2016.BackgroundIn a decision published last Friday and made available and commented on very useful Italian IP resource Marchi&Brevetti, the Rome Court of First Instance put the word 'end' [at least for the time being] to yet another set of proceedings brought by RTI - Reti Televisive Italiane (owned by broadcasting… [read post]
