Search for: "Romero v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
In Arguelles-Romero v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:01 pm
Superior Court (Romero), 13 Cal.4th 497, the California Supreme Court held that a Superior Court Judge could strike an allegation or vacate a finding under the Three Strikes law if they saw fit to do so in the interests of justice. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 5:36 am
Here: galanda-broadman-response-re-nooksack-supreme-court in-re-gabriel-galanda-v-nooksack-tribal-court-tribal-court-of-appeals-motion-for-show-cause-order-re-contempt in-re-gabriel-galanda-v-nooksack-tribal-court-whatcom-county-superior-court-petition-for-entry-of-foreign-judgment rabang-v-romero-tribal-court-complaint [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:54 am
Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007) and Discover Bank v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 12:09 pm
Superior Court (Romero), the California Supreme Court gave defendants a glimpse of hope when it held that a trial court, pursuant to section 1385(a) of the California Penal Code, may, on its own, and “in furtherance of justice” strike or vacate an allegation that a defendant has been previously convicted of a serious and/or violent felony. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 11:16 am
Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497, 530-531 (Romero).) [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:44 am
Superior Court, 2012 Cal. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:05 pm
In Arguelles-Romero v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
For a detailed discussion of this issue, see Arguelles-Romero v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:04 am
” Romero v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
(See Arguelles–Romero v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
Because the superior-court petition was untimely, it wasn't "properly filed" under Pace v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 4:55 pm
Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497.) [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:12 am
Superior Court, supra. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:07 am
Luis Romero Olguin, I award a further $15,000.00 in damages relating to its “hardball approach”.[19] Pursuant to the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Honda Canada Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
Citing Arguelles-Romero v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 11:41 am
Superior Court and Gentry v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:40 am
Superior Court (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 825, 844 [109 Cal. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:33 pm
(See Arguelles-Romero v. [read post]
