Search for: "Rominger v. County of Colusa" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2014 CEQA 3rd QUARTER REVIEW
7 Oct 2014, 10:06 am by Abbott & Kindermann
County of Colusa), and addressed an important litigation question as to when the agency can recover record-related litigation costs (Coalition for Adequate Review v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Tentative Map Approval Is CEQA “Project”, Holds Third District In Published Opinion Also Addressing Prejudicial Error, Agency Discretion To Adopt Thresholds Of Significance, Deferred Mitigation, And Other Significant CEQA Issues
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Rominger v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Drawing the CEQA fine line: when is an ordinance “not a project”?
10 Sep 2019, 8:42 pm by William W. Abbott
County of Colusa (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 690. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2014 CEQA ANNUAL REVIEW
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Sierra Club v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Blowing Smoke About Impacts? Fourth District Rejects Speculative CEQA Challenge to San Diego’s Medical Marijuana Consumer Cooperative Ordinance, Holds Zoning Ordinances Are Not Necessarily CEQA “Projects”
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Court of Appeal’s Rejection of Other Case Law Relied on by UMMP The Court of Appeal also rejected UMMP’s reliance on Rominger v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sixth District Applies CEQA’s “Fair Argument” Standard, Holds That Despite Project’s Compliance With Local Noise Ordinance, EIR Rather Than Mitigated Negative Declaration Is Required Based On Factual, Non-Expert Evidence Of Noise And Traffic Safety Impacts
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Not A CEQA “Project”? Not So Fast, Lead Agency! Supreme Court Reverses Fourth District’s Decision That San Diego’s Adoption of Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance Was Not A Project Requiring CEQA Review
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Plaintiff’s first argument relied in part on Rominger v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Filtering The CEQA Noise: First District Upholds Santa Rosa’s Negative Declaration For “Dream Center” Youth Housing Project, Holds Non-Expert Predictions Of Significant Noise Impacts Failed To Raise “Fair Argument” Supported By Substantial Evidence
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 151; Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Holds Agency’s Removal of Conservation Designation From Land Formerly Protected Under MSHCP Is “Project” Subject to CEQA; Class 7 and 8 Categorical Exemptions for Environmentally Protective Regulatory Actions Do Not Apply
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of San Diego (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 488, 503; Rominger v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“CEQA-In-Reverse” Case on Remand: First District Holds BAAQMD’s 2010 Air Pollutant Thresholds Not Facially Invalid, But Can’t Be Used For Primarily Intended Purpose
18 Aug 2016, 8:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (See Rominger v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2019 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm by William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
County of Colusa (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 690. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2019 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm by William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
County of Colusa (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 690. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/