Search for: "Ron Lanham"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
The plaintiff claimed that the Does' use of Ron Paul's name in the video constituted false designation of origin in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
The complaint in Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Committee, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
There is a cert petition pending, Ron's post provides a link. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
Such a distinction serves neither the interests of the First Amendment nor the Lanham Act. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:30 am
For now Steve would take us from the brand-laden anecdote and the cultural mix-and-match moment to — as if he were a judge in a Lanham Act case! [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:40 am
For now Steve would take us from the brand-laden anecdote and the cultural mix-and-match moment to–as if he were a judge in a Lanham Act case! [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm
For now Steve would take us from the brand-laden anecdote and the cultural mix-and-match moment to — as if he were a judge in a Lanham Act case! [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:11 pm
All the way back in 1962 the Lanham Trademark Act was amended by striking language requiring confusion, mistake or deception of "purchasers as to the source of origin of such goods and services. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
Congratulations to Ron Colemen for shepherding this case and Profs Volokh and Banner who apparently wrote the petition response. [read post]
6 May 2008, 9:10 pm
More from Ron Coleman:But companies such as Purina are not interested in discussing the matter. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
Ron Collins (Concurring Opinions) for the pointer. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
” As we have written before, the Supreme Court is being asked by our friend Ron Coleman, on behalf of Simon Tam, to declare unconstitutional the disparagement prong of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, as a violation of Mr. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 10:30 am
My 6 year-old daughter reads a series of chapter books by author Ron Roy, which are called the A to Z Mysteries. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:05 am
The moderator was IP superstar Brendan O’Rourke, who cruelly, on-the-record, and correctly reminded me, “Ron, you lost the Jews for Jesus case, okay? [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:38 am
Ron Coleman UPDATE: This screed grew up to be this somewhat more reasoned treatment. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
Ron Coleman, partner at US law firm Goetz Fitzpatrick, says: “The drafters of the Lanham Act [the US’s federal trademark statute] never considered whether a registration could be revoked retroactively upon a finding that, when applied for, the trademark was not eligible for registration because late-coming petitioners succeeded in proving that it was derogatory of an ethnic group. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 11:55 am
Some Related Posts: * Fake Political Attack Video Doesn’t Violate Lanham Act–Ron Paul v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:52 pm
On November 18, 2010, Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore) announced that he would put a public hold on COICA during this Congress. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:45 am
” Steve explained as follows: Hi Ron, thanks for dropping by. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
[et al.].Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, c2010.Criminal ProcedureKF9625 .G65 2010Evaluating capacity to waive Miranda rights / Alan M. [read post]
