Search for: "Ronald Mann" Results 201 - 220 of 442
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
ConAgra Foods, comes from Ronald Mann, who reports for this blog that the “case seems most unlikely to have any broad or long-term impact. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:25 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Ronald Mann described the dissent as follows:[The majority] spurs Justice Scalia to quips that are pointed even by the elevated standards of his stylistic panache. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann covered the ruling for this blog; other coverage comes from Bradley McAllister for JURIST, And in Musacchio v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Ronald Mann has an interesting discussion of the likelihood and possibilities of this probable future case in a January 21, 2016 post on the SCOTUS blog (here). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann analyzed the decision for this blog; commentary comes from Hera Arsen at Ogletree Deakins and Archis Parasharami (and others) at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann covered the decision for this blog, while Timothy Verrall analyzed the case for Ogletree Deakins. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann covered the oral argument for this blog, while I did the same for my own blog. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:32 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog, and Tyler Vandeventer and Jason Ottomano did the same for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:00 pm by Steven G. Pearl
As explained in this article by Ronald Mann on SCOTUSblog, the opinion rests on three basic premises: "First, the Court concludes that the contract unambiguously refers to valid state law, not to the doctrine preempted by the Court’s decision in Concepcion. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann covered the decision for this blog; other coverage comes from Daniel Fisher of Forbes and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 10:42 am by Kent Scheidegger
Ronald Mann has this report on the oral argument and thinks it looks grim for the tribe (and, therefore, good for the government). [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 10:05 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here, from Ronald Mann, is “Argument analysis: Justices dubious of tribe’s claim for equitable tolling in government contract dispute. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog, with Tyler Vandeventer and Jason Ottomano doing the same for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann also has our preview of today’s other case, Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog, while in The New England Journal of Medicine Nicholas Bagley and Christopher Koller argue that the case “threatens to cripple these databases and other state initiatives that aim to improve the health care system. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:15 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog, while Ben Rosales and Thomas Kim do the same for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:08 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann covered the oral argument for this blog, with other coverage coming from Cristian Farias of The Huffington Post, and commentary from Justin Sadowsky at Dubitante. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:07 am by Amy Howe
  Finally, Ronald Mann covered the argument in DIRECTV v. [read post]