Search for: "Rooney v. Rooney" Results 121 - 140 of 242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 8:37 am by John Day
In the meantime, if you have additional questions, please contact Sarah Rooney, AAJ Regulatory Counsel, at sarah.rooney@justice.org. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Vardy v Rooney [2020] EWHC 3156 (QB) A trial of a preliminary issue on meaning following Ms Rooney’s statement on her Instagram account that she had identified who was leaking details of her personal life to the Sun. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 4:34 am
The "enforcement of a charging lien is founded upon the equitable notion that the proceeds of a settlement are ultimately under the control of the court, and the parties within its jurisdiction, [and the court] will see that no injustice is done to its own officers'" (Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot v City of New York, 302 AD2d 183, 187 [2002], quoting Rooney v Second Ave. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:57 pm by INFORRM
Case Law: Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails – Hugh Tomlinson QC A load of hype? [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 1:06 am by Adam Wagner
  In particular, in W v Westminster([2005] EWHC 102 (QB)) and Clift v Slough BC [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)) he provided remedies to claimants against public authorities in circumstances where the application of conventional libel principles might have appeared to lead to their refusal. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:00 am by Race to the Bottom
Lyft shares opened at $87.24 per share when it began trading on the Nasdaq (Rooney, CNBC; Lyft S-1; Bond, Financial Times). [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 8:28 am by tjsllibrary
This sort of data commands much higher prices—and is much sought after by cyber criminals” (Rooney). [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
A defamation claim has been issued in the Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy saga which started when Rooney claimed Vardy had been leaking stories about her to the press. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:01 am
Department of Labor (DOL) has recently issued guidance clarifying that employees who are neither the biological nor legal parent or guardian of a child may nevertheless be entitled to leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for the birth, adoption, or care of that child if the employee’s relationship with the child meets certain criteria.New employer obligations to nursing mothers under the Fair Labor Standards ActPoyner & Spruill LLPThe Department of Labor recently issued a… [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 11:30 am
From there the Eleventh Circuit applied Tinker v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:20 am by Lindsay A. Heller
  This issue arises again in the recent unpublished decision of Sahai v. [read post]