Search for: "Root v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2011, 12:01 pm
Superior Court of Orange County, 246 P.3d 877 (Cal. 2011) and Clayworth v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 3:25 pm by Mark Murakami
Ispat Island, Inc.,413 F.3d 628, 632 (7th Cir. 2005) (“[V]icarious liability may extend to FELA or Jones Act employers under the traditional doctrine of respondeat superior. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 1:46 pm by Larry Bache
The efficient proximate cause doctrine is rooted in the Latin maxim causa proxima, non remota spectator. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm by Thomas Surmanski
It is pretty clear that [Jordan] means the date of decision” (para. 16). 2018 Trial Court Decisions: CharleyIn late June, 2018, the Ontario Superior Court turned its mind to this question in the case of R. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
This was a 6-1 decision with Wecht dissenting on procedural grounds.The Bristol decision reversed the law set forth in the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s previous ruling in the separate case of Hopkins v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Harris.On appeal from the Superior Court of NewJersey, Law Division, Salem County, DocketNo. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 5:12 am by Stephen Pitel
In Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani-Utenam), 2020 SCC 4, the Supreme Court of Canada held (by 5-4 majority) that the motion to strike failed and that the Quebec court had jurisdiction over the entire claim advanced by the Innu. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 5:12 am by Stephen Pitel
In Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani-Utenam), 2020 SCC 4, the Supreme Court of Canada held (by 5-4 majority) that the motion to strike failed and that the Quebec court had jurisdiction over the entire claim advanced by the Innu. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 5:12 am by Stephen Pitel
In Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani-Utenam), 2020 SCC 4, the Supreme Court of Canada held (by 5-4 majority) that the motion to strike failed and that the Quebec court had jurisdiction over the entire claim advanced by the Innu. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:09 am by John Jascob
Superior Court (U.S. 1990), the Court held that a court can exercise general jurisdiction over an individual defendant located its borders, “no matter how fleeting his visit. [read post]