Search for: "Roper v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-282, is yet another gift from the St. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
Roper, 14-6873, a capital case that asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
Roper, 14-6873, which asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which Justice Antonin Scalia issued a statement regarding the denial. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And yet I took the job.And swore the oath set forth in 28 USC § 453.Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the… [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
Board Decision and Girl Scouts of the United States” Commentator: Martha Jones Closing Comments: Sarah Barringer Gordon [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Saira Mohamed
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:50 am by Paul Horwitz
It is an oddly consoling aspect of the United States Supreme Court that we basically get the Justices we deserve. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am by Eugene Volokh
Ct. 2705, 2724 (2010) (describing Cohen as involving punishment based on “the offensive content” of the speaker’s profane message); United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Stephen Wermiel
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]