Search for: "Roper v. Weaver" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
Raleigh, NC 27673 Phone: (919) 733-9250; (V/TTY); (800) 821-6922 (V/TTY/Toll Free in NC only) Fax: (919) 733-9173 Pathways to the Future, Inc. 525 Mineral Springs Drive Sylva, NC 28779 Phone: (828) 631-1167(V/TTY) Fax: (828) 631-1169 E-mail: pathways@main.nc.us State ADA Coordinator Larry Jones NC Office on the ADA 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603-1336 Phone: (919) 715-2302 (V/TTY) E-mail: Larry.Jones@ncmail.net Web:… [read post]
22 May 2007, 12:01 pm
Yesterday, by a vote of six to three, the Supreme Court dismissed as improvidently granted the writ of certiorari in No. 06-313, Roper v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:48 am
A reader email drew our attention to the saucy conclusion of Justice Antonin Scalia's dissent in Roper v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 8:54 am
Capital Defense Weekly gathers opinions by other writers about yesterday's decision in Roper v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:05 pm
Monday's flurry of opinions included a fascinating decision in Roper v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:50 pm
By a vote of six to three, the Supreme Court today dismissed as improvidently granted the writ of certiorari in No. 06-313, Roper v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:19 pm
Gia Kim has this summary of today's DIG in No. 06-313, Roper v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
Here, at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the Supreme Court's dismissal of Roper v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:13 am
United States, No. 06-376 (opinion here; oral argument transcript here); and Roper v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:07 am
The vote was 6-3 in Roper v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:53 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse has this article on yesterday's argument in Roper v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
During oral argument yesterday in Roper v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 3:13 pm
This AP story provides some highlights of today's SCOTUS oral argument in Roper v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:01 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Wednesday in the case of Roper v. [read post]