Search for: "Rosa v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Lisa Daniels
Leibowitz then proposes a method by which the defense can destroy material obtained outside of discovery, while preserving any exculpatory or Brady material, by employing the framework used in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:40 am by Aimee Hess
Enter into a unitization agreement authorized by the Railroad Commission of Texas. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:42 am
United States of America), 2008 Alfred Boll, Nottebohm (Lichtenstein v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:33 am by Rick Houghton
Although the armed forces could employ this prohibition to restrain retirees’ political speech, the government has only initiated court-martial proceedings against one retired service member—nearly one hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 10:56 am by David M. Goldman
Florida offers some of the strongest homestead protection laws in all of the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 6:47 pm by Rishabh Bhandari
Cantil kicks off the second half of the day by advising the court that Rosa Eliades, one of Nashiri’s two additional civilian counsel, actually received her clearance on September 6th. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:11 am by Elena Chachko
The 1946 Convention outlines the immunities and privileges of the UN as an organization, as well as those of three groups of individuals: representatives of member states, UN officials (i.e., permanent staff), and experts on missions for the UN. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:23 am by David DePaolo
Wright II said the United States is excluded from the operation of such state laws because of its sovereign immunity and ruled that the statutory deadlines are not binding on CMS. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
” In his dissent in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
(Yes sir) [applause] If we are wrong, the Constitution of the United States is wrong. [read post]