Search for: "Rosalind English"
Results 1 - 20
of 207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2011, 3:46 am
Withdrawal from the European court of human rights is not a legal problem Rosalind English in The Guardian: Criticisms of the Policy Exchange report distracts from legitimate points made in a political debate masquerading as a legal one An analysis of the The European Convention and the ECHR from an experienced lawyer…well worth reading. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:10 am
And as David Allen Green observed in his excellent critique, English law on the misuse of private information remains unchanged: Mosley would still be able to bring his case and the News of the World would still have to pay substantial damages and costs. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 5:13 am
Edited by Adam Wagner, Angus McCullough QC and Rosalind English, it will be updated regularly with [...] [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
I hope you will excuse a brief promotional interlude, but my fellow Blogista, Rosalind English, is organising the second annual Burnham Market Book Festival which runs from 1st to 3rd October 2010 in Burnham Market, Norfolk. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:46 am
This year’s festival of books and ideas, organised by my fellow blogger Rosalind English, takes place once again from 14 – 16 October in the elegant market town of Burnham Market in North Norfolk, with a great line up of speakers, and subjects ranging from the Tudor Queens to the life of Leo Tolstoy. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
It was coincidental that the cricket libel case, Cairns v Modi and Lady Justice Arden’s speech on media intrusion and human rights “Striking the Balance” came out on the same day. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:51 pm
The UK Human Rights blog from 1 Crown Office Row is an excellent resource for lawyers and non-lawyers…Rosalind English has shed a bit more light on the Woolas case and has come up with some serious ‘food for thought’. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:59 am
“Last week Rosalind English did a summary post on the important Supreme Court case of Lukaszewski and others, R (on the application of Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20 – read judgement. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 2:55 am
The damning conclusion of the Joint Committee on Human Rights that there is no evidence to justify expanding closed proceedings (expertly dissected by Rosalind English earlier in the week) vied for column inches with leaks that the Government planned to introduce ‘real time’ monitoring of how we use the internet in the interests of national security.” Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 6th April 2012 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:48 am
Le Roux and others v Dey (South African Constitutional Court) [2011] ZACC 4 With the new libel reform proposals doing the consultation rounds it is enlightening to see how other jurisdictions strike the balance privacy and dignity on the one hand, and freedom of expression on the other. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:04 pm
An Amsterdam court has ruled that Google should delist an unofficial “blacklist” of doctors maintained by a discussion group on the internet. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:47 pm
On the face of it Standard Verlags GmbH v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:55 am
Furthermore, Google Spain had no bearing on how English law should approach a contention that a given defendant was liable for breach of Article 8. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
The reasoning behind the judgment The principle of freedom of expression in English law has long militated against the grant of interim injunctions to silence allegations that might be proved true at trial. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
Most of us resignedly consent to the use of cookies in order to use internet sites, vaguely aware that these collect information about our browsing habits in order to target us with advertisements. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
“Harassment” is an ordinary English word, but it can take many different forms, and most people would regard stalking as the paradigm case of harassment. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
The decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney (see earlier post by Rosalind English) removes the immunity previously enjoyed by those who have acted as experts from suit by their former clients. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:00 am
This piece is in response to Rosalind English’s post on this blog arguing that in M.S. v United Kingdom the European Court extended to far the ambit of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which protects against torture, and inhuman or degrading treatment. [read post]
International human rights can help reverse yet another heavy blow on sexual and reproductive health
25 Jun 2017, 5:07 am
Women who choose to exercise their sexual and reproductive rights have to travel to mainland Britain, but they have to face costs (about £900 in the recent case discussed by Rosalind English) that would not apply if they lived in England, Wales or Scotland. [read post]
