Search for: "Rose v. McCoy" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2017, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This is true even where the plaintiff is unaware of any malpractice, damages, or injury (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at 300- 301). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The ongoing representation must be specifically related to the matter in which the attorney committed the alleged malpractice (Id.; Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 68 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
McCoy because of his sexual preference and this endeared Whitaker to the evangelical Christians who revel in the anti-gay movement. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
(Spicy IP) Sanctity of Section 21 Patents Act (Spicy IP) ‘Abandoning’ legal fogginess: A proposal for patent clarity – section 21 Patents Act (Spicy IP) Court gives nod to patent for image on flowers: Speaking Roses International Inc v Controller-General Of Patents and Anr. [read post]