Search for: "Rose v. State of California" Results 41 - 60 of 478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
The issue presented is whether the California state court's decision affirming the defendant's murder conviction was an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The cert. petition seeks to overturn the California Supreme Court's decision in Rose v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
" These concerns were prompted by a ruling from a California District Court on August 13, 2010 in Center for Food Safety, et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 9:25 am by Christina Burnett
An earlier article examined alien land laws in the United States, telling the story of Oyama v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm by Carlo Van den Bosch
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
The number of Web vendors of cigarettes rose from 88 in 2000 to 772 early last year, according to the California attorney general's office. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:05 pm by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California on civil rights cases. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:07 pm
Hernandez, the California Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Five) expressly disagreed with Nicholson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 10:47 am by Karen Gullo
Ignjatov, a criminal case in California, the court found that the practice of allowing agents to use GPS devices without a warrant rose to the level of government misconduct because it clearly violated the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
More than ten requests for publication were filed in the Brinker case: Cross Country Healthcare, California Employment Law Council, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Paul, Plevin, Sullivan, etc., Akin, Gump, Strauss, etc., Winston & Strawn, McKenna, Long & Aldridge, Sheppard Mullin, Wells Fargo, Proskauer Rose and Manatt Phelps Phillips. [read post]