Search for: "Rosenberg v. Lawrence" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2013, 9:22 pm by Patent Docs
A panel consisting of Jeffery Cross of Freeborn & Peters; Albert Foer, president and founder of the American Antitrust Institute; and Lawrence Rosenberg of Jones Day will consider such questions as: • How will the "rule of reason" structure evolve in these cases? [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am by Daniel Hemel
Maryland, the court said that in general we don’t want to be micromanaging all the details of state taxation,” attorney Lawrence Rosenberg told the justices at the end of Monday’s oral argument in Dawson v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The 2008 affidavit by the TLC's former licensing director offered by defendant in support of his motion fails to demonstrate conclusively that plaintiff has no cause of action (see Lawrence v Graubard Miller, 11 NY3d 588, 595 [2008]). [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The 2008 affidavit by the TLC's former licensing director offered by defendant in support of his motion fails to demonstrate conclusively that plaintiff has no cause of action (see Lawrence v Graubard Miller, 11 NY3d 588, 595 [2008]). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
Case in point: Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Lawrence Knipel’s recent decision in Matter of Lev v Rosenberg, 2019 NY Slip Op 30824(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Mar. 13, 2019]. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:18 pm by Tom Smith
Already in Florida, one case has been tossed out and is on appeal before the 11th Circuit (Castro v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 8:39 am by Ezra Rosser
Rosenberg, and Bryce Wilson Stucki Abortion Out of Reach: The Exacerbation of Wealth Disparities After Dobbs v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
This is essentially his argument about Brown v. [read post]