Search for: "Ross Runkel"
Results 1 - 20
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
” Additional commentary comes from David Cortman at the Daily Caller, Michael Bobelian at Forbes, Walter Olson at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Maureen Collins at The Christian Post and Ross Runkel in a video at his eponymous blog. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
” In a video posted on his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel predicts “a clear-cut victory for the schools. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:55 am
In a video on his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel calls the decision a “hollow victory” for the employee. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:39 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel discusses Comcast v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel observes that “[t]he US Supreme Court can get behind being unanimous when faced with a statutory phrase that is written in ‘plain and unambiguous statutory language. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 4:06 am
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel observes that “[t]hree upcoming LGBT-Title VII cases will test the US Supreme Court’s views on original intent, stare decisis, and statutory construction. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
At this eponymous blog, Ross Runkel notes that the decision “does not give employee-plaintiffs a free pass[: …] Employers can still get cases dismissed for failure to exhaust if they raise the issue early on in the litigation. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
Ross Runkel discusses the opinion at his eponymous blog. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
” Commentary comes from Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog and Joshua Lushnat at Ogletree Deakins. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel suggests that the omission of any mention of Chevron v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 6:07 am
The Court concluded that the plaintiff had sufficiently pleaded a Title VII hostile work environment claim.Now seems like a good time to share Ross Runkel's Case of the Week video series too. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel notes that the recent decision in New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel remarks that “[s]ome pundits were surprised that the Court would issue a ‘pro-worker,’ ‘anti-arbitration’ decision, failing to understand that the Justices all do their best to be faithful to the words Congress puts into its statutes. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:53 am
” Briefly: At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel has a video preview of New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:57 am
In a video on his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am
” Ross Runkel looks at Lamps Plus at his eponymous blog. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel observes that “[p]erhaps the most important takeaway from this decision is the point that the Court rejects the principle that that FLSA exemptions should be construed narrowly. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
Commentary comes from Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog, who remarks that “[t]wo concurring opinions will be of interest to anyone who wants to know the intellectual process that Justices use when interpreting statutes. [read post]
