Search for: "Ross Runkel" Results 141 - 160 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
See also a Wall Street Journal article here, Professor Ross Runkel’s analysis here, a Legal Times article here, and commentary from the ADR Prof Blog here. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:30 am by John Phillips
Ross Runkel discusses why the possession of a gun at work defeated a workers’ comp claim. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:20 pm
Ross Runkel discusses today's opinion here at Law Memo. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 2:10 pm
Ross Runkel at LawMemo.com has this post on the Court's decision in Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 11:09 am
Four years ago when one of the regular employment law bloggers hit a cold patch it made for a substantial impact, but that is no longer the case.While many of the "old-timers" like George Lenard, Ross Runkel, Michael Fitzgibbon and the crew at Lynch, Ryan whose Workers Comp' Insider just turned four last week, are still going strong, there fortunately has been a whole new group adding their collective insights. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:47 am
Supreme Court decided to consider some issues that arise in federal class actions:Whether claims for monetary relief can be certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2)—which by its terms is limited to injunctive or corresponding declaratory relief—and, if so, under what circumstances.and Whether the class certification ordered under Rule 23(b)(2) was consistent with Rule 23(a).Here's a comprehensive post with cites to all kinds of relevant information from… [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:46 am
Accretive LLC, courtesy of Professor Ross Runkel's   LawMemo Arbitration Blog.] [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:02 am
The full opinion is embedded below (or view online here):EEOC Ruling HT: Ross Runkel via Twitter. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:09 pm by John Phillips
For more on the Stolt decision, see Ross Runkel, Jottings By An Employer’s Lawyer, and Workplace Prof Blog. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 am
See also: Ross Runkel's SCOTUS Will Hear FLSA Pharma Sales Rep Case. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:45 am by Daniel Schwartz
Various other employment law blogs and authors have already chimed in on the case, including Workplace Prof, Michael Fox, Ross Runkel, and the SCOTUSBlog so I won't try to attempt to repeat their wisdom. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm by Walter Olson
Horton, Inc. and Michael Cuda; Ross Runkel, Corporate Counsel] Richard Epstein on “living wage” legislation [Defining Ideas] In Greece, law providing early retirement for “hazardous” jobs was extended to some that are not so hazardous, like hairdressing, pastry making and radio announcing [Mark Steyn via Instapundit, IBTimes, Reuters] “Prosecutor’s double-dippers draw millions from New Jersey pension funds” [Mark Lagerkvist, DC… [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
Ross Runkel summarizes today's five opinions and the summary reversal in this post at the Supreme Court Times blog. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:40 pm
  Here are the preliminary views of Scotusblog, Boston ERISA Law Blog, and Ross Runkel. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:26 pm
In addition to Andrew Dawson's preview of the cases (available here), other summaries and analyses include: Ross Runkel's "Preview and Prediction" on his Supreme Court Times blog; This story in the Washington, D.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:00 am by Seth Borden
More commentary and resources: "State statutes forbidding injunction of peaceful labor picketing are unconstitutional" -- Ross Runkel's LawMemo "Court Holds Labor Picketing Laws Unconstitutional" -- Metropolitan News-Enterprise "Calif. appeals court sides with grocery store in picketing dispute" -- LegalNewsline   [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 6:23 am
Ross Runkel at his Arbitration Blog asks an important question: "Arbitration - Is Justice Served? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:58 pm
For more info see Daniel Schwartz's take on Connecticut Employment Law Blog; and Ross Runkel's coverage on LawMemo. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:59 pm
BREAKING NEWS: Ross Runkel at LawMemo reports that the Supreme Court has fast tracked this case for a hearing this term, possibly in April. [read post]