Search for: "Ross Runkel"
Results 161 - 180
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2010, 8:19 am
As is almost always the case, the first to bring it to my attention is Ross Runkel at his LawMemo Employment Law Blog, SCOTUS will review "cat's paw" case. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:45 am
See also: Ross Runkel, SCOTUS Grants Cert on Federal Employment Jurisdiction Issue. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 4:07 pm
As Ross Runkel observed in his blog, this case (Sprint/United Management v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
And Ross Runkel of the Supreme Court Times previews Rita, Claiborne, and Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm
[Ross Runkel and Federalist Society podcast with Karen Harned on McLane Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
Coverage comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Tony Mauro of Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Ross Runkel at the Ross Runkel Report, and Daniel Fisher of Forbes. [read post]
16 May 2009, 3:51 am
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pensiono December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSwiki hereo Noted here: Work Place Prof Blog and Ross Runkel, each noting post-argument briefs on the effect of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act on the caseGross v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 8:04 am
He did get George Schatzski, formerly at University of Texas and now at Arizona State University school of law.None of the three professors who blog at the Workplace Prof blog are on the list either, nor is the other blogging professor, Ross Runkel. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
” Ross Runkel Report discusses last week’s cert. grant in Lane v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 4:33 am
” Briefly: At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel discusses a cert petition that “raises the issue of whether the Federal Arbitration Act’s Section 1 exemption, which applies on its face only to ‘contracts of employment,’ is inapplicable to independent contractor agreements. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
Check out Ross Runkel’s blog. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 2:34 pm
Ross Runkel of the Supreme Court Times Blog summarizes this week's arguments here. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 10:42 am
Ross Runkel’s blog summarizes three of those cases which deal with the issue of retaliation. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:44 am
Hat Tip/Additional Coverage: Ross Runkel via Twitter; Randy Enochs's post in his Wisconsin Employment and Labor Law Blog; and Eugene Volokh's post on the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:36 am
Given that legalization is on the ballot in California in November, see a summary of the proposal and get the actual text here, this could become an even bigger issue.Hat tip to the locals who called this to my attention, the folks at Stoel, Rives who not only posted about the result, Oregon Supreme Court: Employers Are Not Required to Accommodate Medical Marijuana, but filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Pacific Legal Foundation and the National Federation of Independent Business, and… [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 1:13 pm
With that backdrop, and given the current political climate, Congressional action may be just around the corner.See also - Ross Runkel: Gross will be "the biggest employment law case of 2009" and sharing my view that Congressional action is likely (actually he writes it's "certain"). [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 7:28 am
Hat tip to John Phillips at The Word on Employment Law and Ross Runkel's Employment Law Blog.Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 6:15 am
Ross Runkel's blog does a pretty good job this morning spelling out the details. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:39 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel discusses Comcast v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:26 am
— via Jeff Nowak’s FMLA InsightsLabor Relations NLRB goes rogue against small business — via The Hill NLRB reinstates free meals for striking BBQ workers — via Ross Runkel Report Your Next Airline Delay May Carry the Union Label — via LaborPains.org Protecting the Employer’s Brand During a Labor Dispute — via Vorys on Labor Chipotle’s Sweatshop! [read post]
