Search for: "Ross v. Arizona, State of" Results 1 - 20 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In 2022, then-gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake sued the Arizona Secretary of State (among others), alleging that Arizona's use of electronic voting machines was unconstitutional because of the risk that the machines would be hacked. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:19 pm by John Ross
In 2020, Idaho passed a law to prohibit most abortions in the state in the event the Supreme Court ever overturned Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:00 am by Andrea Gass
HeinOnline, a database that offers unparalleled access to periodicals, government documents, international resources, and more, has launched a new LGBTQ+ Rights database that all Arizona State University users of HeinOnline have access to. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And also, a starkly different holding from the Tenth Circuit in the wake of Egbert v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]