Search for: "Ross v. DOR"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2022, 5:37 am
Ross,[12] and is being published before the case is decided. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
Yet the Supreme Court has not applied the extraterritoriality test or the inconsistent regulation test in recent decades,[13] and commentators and lower courts have doubted whether these tests have much practical contemporary relevance beyond what the two standard Dormant Commerce Clause principles—discrimination and undue burden—prohibit. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:08 pm
This was described by the Court in Multani v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
The ongoing case of Ktunaxa Nation v BC represents the first opportunity for the Supreme Court of Canada to consider whether the destruction of an Aboriginal sacred site constitutes a violation of freedom of religion under section 2(a) of the Charter. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
