Search for: "Ross v. Day" Results 21 - 40 of 868
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2023, 2:19 pm by John Ross
After the third such call in one day, one officer purports to drive away, but in actuality lies in wait. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Noncompliance with the statute renders an attempted conversion “ineffective” (Miller v Ross, 43 AD3d 730 [1st Dept 2007]). [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:47 am by Mark Ashton
Ross, not to be confused with the epic child support battle Humphreys v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On the same day Collins Rice J will hand down judgment in the cases of Zia Chishti v The Telegraph Media Group and McGee v Lewis. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
This means that “when the disposition of a case is based upon a lack of standing only, the lower courts have not yet considered the merits of the claim,” and the dismissal is “not intended to have any determinative effect ‘on the merits’ of the action” (Landau v LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross, 11 NY3d 8 [2008]). [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Following the murder of George Floyd, the mayor of D.C. instituted a strict nighttime curfew for three days to combat rioting, vandalism, and theft. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm by Justia Team
On presentation day, you can also join the webinar from the Justia Connect dashboard when presentation time rolls around. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Josh Blackman
Ross I considered for inclusion three other cases that were close, but ultimately did not make the cut: U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm by John Ross
Concurrence: One of these days we should resolve what, if anything, is left of Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
  The Supreme Court announced that it would hold its “mop up” conference for October Term 2022 on Thursday, after completing the day’s opinion announcements. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The Fifth Circuit—after consulting the Supreme Court's "delphic" ruling in Bostock v. [read post]