Search for: "Ross v. Mark's Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2007, 9:12 am by Sander Gelsing
’s rights in the famous mark BARBIE were not enough to for our Supreme Court to find a likelihood of confusion with a restaurant operating under the name Barbie’s (Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., 2006 SCC 22). [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 1:20 pm
In this post at the Supreme Court Times Blog, Ross Runkel reports that Altadis USA, Inc v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 12:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  There was no evidence of any explicit statements of association etc. by defendants (citing Novalogic, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978),[1] much like FOIA requesters need have no particular reason to obtain government records. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm by Walter Olson
Horton, Inc. and Michael Cuda; Ross Runkel, Corporate Counsel] Richard Epstein on “living wage” legislation [Defining Ideas] In Greece, law providing early retirement for “hazardous” jobs was extended to some that are not so hazardous, like hairdressing, pastry making and radio announcing [Mark Steyn via Instapundit, IBTimes, Reuters] “Prosecutor’s double-dippers draw millions from New Jersey pension funds” [Mark… [read post]