Search for: "Ross v. State, Dept. of Human Services" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Supreme Court* Public Citizen's most recent Sup Ct Watch List here* SCOTUSblog's most recent Petitions to Watch here * Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases- Pending and Decided herePetition for Cert Granted:Crawford v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Gene Editing Judith Daar, University of California Irvine School of Law, Human Germline Genome Editing: Dilemmas in Informed Consent Eileen Kane, Penn State Law, A Volatile Year in Human Genome Editing Myrisha Lewis, Howard University School of Law, The Coming Age of Gene Editing: Medical Promise, Regulation, and the Revival of Decades of Debate Maxwell Mehlman, Case Western Reserve University, Regulating Do-It-Yourself Gene Editing C. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pensiono o December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript hereo o SCOTUS docket hereo o SCOTUSwiki hereo o Noted here: Work Place Prof Blog and Ross Runkel, each noting post-argument briefs on the effect of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act on the caseGross v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Tennessee Dept. of Transp., No. 07-6491 (6th Cir. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 21, 2009)(Unpub)Reversing dismissal of Dept Public Works ee's pro se race discrim complaint>> Rambacher v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Amelia County Sheriff's Office7th Cir.o Muslim Associate States Cause of Action Against Large Law Firm For Post 9-11 DiscriminationHasan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]