Search for: "Rouse v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
But there, the analogy with the United States ends. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
I blogged two weeks ago about Hansen v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
In Hansen v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 7:52 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The idea is apparently that everyone knows what the “normal” path must be, but because Democrats do not like that path, they might rouse themselves to do something … weird, maybe? [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The 2021 Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm
Bush v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 3:51 am
In Cox v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
The promise of the nation’s first Black woman on the United States Supreme Court is a dramatic, historic change. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:10 am
S. ___, ___ (2017) (slip op., at 9) (quoting United States v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:41 am
I really enjoyed The People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
United KingdomThe Duchess of Sussex v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
§ 1983, provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law[.] [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm
In 1996, she wrote the decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
If they cannot even be roused to say something when the President of the United States abuses his powers to violently stop citizens from exercising their First Amendment rights, why would they say anything to warn Trump not to shred the rest of the Constitution? [read post]
