Search for: "Rowley v. Rowley" Results 1 - 20 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2014, 8:35 pm by Simon Gibbs
The recent decision of Costs Judge Master Rowley, in Burton v Cranfield Delta Whiskey Group, granting relief from sanctions, is an unusual one. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 10:09 pm by Simon Gibbs
To recap, Master Rowley, on a line-by-line assessment, reduced the costs claimed from £208,236.54 to £99,655.74. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:22 am by Rick Hills
Rowley (the governing precedent, calling for a plan “reasonably calculated to provide educational benefit”) are opaque. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:32 pm by Simon Gibbs
Hot on the heels of Master Gordon-Saker’s proportionality decision in BNM v MGN Limited [2016] EWHC B13 (Costs) is another decision from the Senior Courts Costs Office, this time from Master Rowley in Dr Brian May v Wavell Group Plc. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 10:24 pm by Simon Gibbs
A decision from Master Rowley in the Senior Courts Costs Office throws new confusion onto the issue of proportionality. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:55 pm by Simon Gibbs
I have previously questioned the reasoning of Master Rowley, when dealing with the new proportionality test in May v Wavell Group, that: “The proportionate amount of costs must inevitably be smaller for a case which concludes early than one which reaches a final hearing. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a recent Berks County decision in the case of Kelley v. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:22 pm by Jim Gerl
              Recently, the Supreme Court clarified the FAPE standard in Endrew F by Joseph F v. [read post]