Search for: "Roy v. Government Employees Insurance Co. "
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2011, 8:45 am
§ 31.3121(d)-1(c); see, e.g., Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:35 pm
Other courts have applied the common-law agency test set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:15 am
Basic Construction Co., 711 F.2d 570 (4th Cir. 1983). [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:19 am
Such insurance plans cannot include any extra co-pays or premiums for this coverage. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm
The English Court encountered this situation recently in R v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:14 am
Waterous Co., 347 F.3d 685, 689 (8th Cir. 2003), and a recent district court case, Basso v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 1:27 pm
This actually makes sense, though: two of my (awesome) co-bloggers take opposite sides in the debate on whether or not insurance policies should be bought and sold across state lines. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
As a result, many employers likely think that they won't be caught if they refuse to hire litigious employees—and likely think that, if they hire and later dismiss a litigious employee, the risk of a future lawsuit by the employee is greater than the risk of a lawsuit for retaliatory refusal to hire.[4] The same of course is possible in other situations. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
By V. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
In addition to the tax changes mentioned here, many states will see automatic adjustments to a range of tax rates, from inflation-indexing of gas taxes or income tax rates and brackets to formula-driven adjustments to unemployment insurance tax rates. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
