Search for: "Roy v. United States Government" Results 21 - 40 of 294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2023, 8:16 pm by Josh Blackman
" Frederick Douglass, The Constitution of the United States: Is It Pro-Slavery or Anti-Slavery? [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In the first, United States v. [read post]
The summer of our discontents Two months ago, if you prompted Version 3 of the AI-art generator MidJourney to generate depictions of an “otter on a plane using wifi,” you were rewarded with the nonsense in the left panel of our lead graphic. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Yet units of government are entitled to have, express, and act on, their own views about contestable subjects. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am by Emma Snell
  Attorney General Merrick Garland has threatened to sue states that have outlawed or restricted abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
The speech, even if erroneous or knowingly false might fall outside First Amendment protections, especially if they were spoken by an ordinary person, not the President of the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 1:16 pm by Derek P. Hartman
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held state agencies are not immune from claims brought under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) in the case Torres v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 3:26 pm by Suzanna Sherry
Le Roy Torres was working as a Texas state trooper when he was called to active duty in the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:29 am by Emma Snell
The memo from Gilbert Cisneros, the defense undersecretary for personnel, is an attempt to give troops the same benefits regardless of where they are stationed, now that 13 states have moved to ban abortion after Friday’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
After 19 days of public hearings producing a 10,000-page record, the Commission concluded that NEPA did not require the SEC to mandate such disclosures, and the courts later agreed.[7] While the SEC in the 1971 release had limited disclosure to “material matters,” in 1975 the Commission mandated disclosure of all environmental proceedings to which a government was a party, whether or not the amounts at issue were material. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:16 am by Suzanna Sherry
Maine (an earlier state sovereign immunity case) and District of Columbia v. [read post]