Search for: "Royall v. Legislation & Policy Division" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
The focus of this post, however, is the legislation on the disposal of altars and fonts; in the instant case, the Chancellor stated: “Since the altar will have been dedicated to its sacramental role in the celebration of the Eucharist, or Lord’s Supper, it should not be profaned by any secular use which might result from its sale or disposal for any non-liturgical purpose. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2022 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
The Assisted Dying Bill [Lords] was given a second reading without division and committed to a Committee of the whole House. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:25 am by Jennifer Davis
Borah Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This is because courts consider D&O policies are obtained for these very risks, so are loath to interpret the policy in a way that makes it commercially useless. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:52 pm by Patricia Hughes
Third reading and Royal Assent took place on August 14th. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
  In this case, those principles--grounded in a consequential division between public and private functions, between autonomous institutions and divisible functions within such organizations, and between regulation and management--may be losing its coherence in the face of new regulatory structures centered on production chains and national development models. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
But President Biden is under great pressure to heal the “tribal division” in U.S. politics even at risk of leaving the potentially lethal terrorist infection within the body politic waiting to burst open the wound and later the scar. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
Although he relied on many external sources relating to non-discrimination, MacKay J. explained, “My opinion as to the public policy applicable to this case in no way depends on the terms of The Racial Discrimination Act, save to the extent that such Act constitutes a legislative recognition of the policy which I have applied. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
  The case is discussed in an news item on the 5RB website entitled “Rare defamation decision in Chancery Division” On 16 January 2020 Jay J handed down judgment om the case of Wright v Granath [2010] EWHC 51 (QB). [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 Canada (Attorney General) in 1993, and Sauvé v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am by CMS
Whilst EU law has changed since 1998, and the Scotland Act was framed to take account of dynamic nature of EU law, the basic division of policy responsibilities is set out in Schedule 5 and does not change. 1533: Looking at the implications of withdrawal, the Lord Advocate submits that, if EU law ceases to apply in UK, that does not affect the division of policy responsibility in Schedule 5 of the Scotland Act. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Matthias Weller
for claims against its subsidiary – sometimes with success, sometimes not: For example, in Okpabi & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Anor, the English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division, by its Technology and Construction Court, decided that it had no international jurisdiction to hear claims in tort against the Nigerian subsidiary (SPDC) of Royal Dutch Shell (RDC) in connection with environmental and health damages due to oil pollution in the… [read post]