Search for: "Rubin v. Katz"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2008, 3:00 am
In Katz v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 3:45 am
Here are some NY state cases this week in Legal Malpractice:1.Max Markus Katz, et al., appellants, v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., respondent. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:17 pm
Garcia No Undocumented Child Left Behind: Plyler v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:00 am
Arguments in Gentry v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:39 am
” “” A claim for legal malpractice is viable, despite settlement of the underlying action, if it is alleged that settlement of the action was effectively compelled by the mistakes of counsel'” (Schiff v Sallah Law Firm, P.C., 128 AD3d 668, 669, quoting Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d 1082, 1083; see Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:38 am
Indeed, we note that the record establishes that defendant afforded plaintiff and her successor counsel "sufficient time and opportunity to adequately protect plaintiff's rights" (Somma v Dansker & Aspromonte Assoc., 44 AD3d 376, 377; see Maksimiak v Schwartzapfel Novick Truhowsky Marcus, P.C., 82 AD3d 652; Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641; cf. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Doudna is a defendant in the notorious case of Rakofsky v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Here, former counsel established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter [*2]of law dismissing the complaint by demonstrating that their actions did not proximately cause the plaintiff’s alleged damages, and that subsequent counsel had a sufficient opportunity to protect the plaintiff’s rights (see Parklex Assoc. v Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP, 118 AD3d 968, 970; Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641). [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:28 am
Since the judgment of divorce was vacated and the plaintiff was [*3]afforded an opportunity to retain new counsel and to conduct further discovery, the plaintiff cannot, under these circumstances, establish that she has sustained damages proximately caused by Hasin’s alleged negligent representation (see Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641; Perks v Lauto & Garabedian, 306 AD2d 261, 262; Albin v Pearson, 289 AD2d… [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:01 am
In other words, as the contract of sale had already been signed and altered before the real estate closing, contrary to the Schiff defendants' contention, they did not establish as a matter of law that Gross had "a sufficient opportunity to protect the plaintiffs' rights" (Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641), such that Schiff's conduct could not have proximately caused the plaintiff's damages. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
A Musical Experience + Helmut Lang + Henna by Senya + House of Leifer + J&J Snack Foods Corporation + J and V Audio Inc. + JAKKS Pacific, Inc. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
Ocilla Indus., Inc. v Katz, 677 F Supp 1291 [ED NY 1987] [“The disenfranchisement of shareholders poses a serious risk of irreparable harm that cannot be measured in money damages”]). [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Rubin v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Kalpakian 446 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1971) 14 In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig. 712 F. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Mercante, a partner at Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, analyze the recent Supreme Court decision in Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am
Rubin reports for the New York Times. [read post]
Exigent Circumstances: What They Are and How They Allow Police to Search and Seize Without a Warrant
15 Mar 2019, 11:46 am
Ed. 2d 564 (1971), quoting in part Katz v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
