Search for: "Rubio v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 10:46 am
" Christopher v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
California’s notorious section 16600 may even reach non-parties to a contract, according to a California Superior Court. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 7:34 am
Decisions, decisions . . .Paige v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 7:34 am
Decisions, decisions . . .Paige v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
Superior Court, 202 Cal. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
Superior Court, 202 Cal. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:26 am
Imagine Medispa, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
The Court of Appeal will have original jurisdiction over these claims. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
