Search for: "Rudin v. Rudin" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2014, 11:44 am
Thus, what we do not know is whether Rudin is lawfully imprisoned. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 2:10 pm by lpbncontracts
The L.A. times had this article about the recent exchange between "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" producer, Scott Rudin, and New Yorker film critic, David Denby. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 1:27 pm
(Cal.S.C., Dec. 18, 2017, Kurwa v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
”  And in a podcast for Political Junkie, Ken Rudin and I unpack the Court’s decision in the case. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:27 am by Amanda Frost
  In November, the Court heard oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:54 am
With aboriginal justice issues under the microscope this week, a new ruling from the Ontario Court of Justice highlights the problem of unequal access to Gladue programming across the province.In R. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp. v City of Niagara Falls, 133 AD3d 1229, 1229 [4th Dept 2015]). [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 1:00 pm
Rudin, 1996 WL 79861 (S.D.N.Y.) the court observed that California has no novelty requirement for contracts involving ideas (citing Desny v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Rudin 15-324Issue: (1) Whether a later-overturned lower court decision accepting an untimely state habeas petition can equitably toll the federal habeas deadline when the prisoner was on notice that her state petition was filed late and she failed to file a protective federal petition per Pace v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The doctrine tolls the limitations period "where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim" (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306), and " where the continuing representation pertains specifically to [*2][that] matter' " (International Electron Devices [USA] LLC v Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., 71 AD3d 1512, 1513, quoting Shumsky v Eisenstein,… [read post]
10 May 2014, 4:59 pm
Complying with the Supreme Court's dictates in Brady v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“For the continuous representation doctrine to apply to an action sounding in legal malpractice, there must be clear indicia of an ongoing, continuous, developing, and dependent relationship between the client and the attorney, which often includes an attempt by the attorney to rectify an alleged act of malpractice” (International Electron Devices [USA] LLC v Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., 71 AD3d at 1512-1513 [internal quotation marks, ellipsis, brackets and… [read post]