Search for: "Rufo v. Simpson (2001)" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Sukumar v. Sukumar: Court of Appeal Reaffirms Rule that Punitive Damages Cannot Exceed 10 Percent of Defendant's Net Worth
13 Apr 2009, 4:03 pm
Motor Sound Corp. (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 577, 582-583 [defendant's negative net worth was due primarily to accumulated depreciation and a note to its sole shareholder, while it had annual sales exceeding $250,000,000, cash of $19,000,000, and a $50,000,000 line of credit, evidencing its ability to pay punitive damages award of $300,000]; Rufo v. [read post]
California Punitive Damages - http://calpunitives.blogspot.com/
The Largest Punitive Damages Award to Survive Appeal in California?
23 Apr 2009, 5:46 pm
Simpson (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 573: $25 million4. [read post]
California Punitive Damages - http://calpunitives.blogspot.com/
Sacramento Car Accident Victim May Face Second Civil Trial, Part 5 of 14
8 Nov 2009, 7:39 am by Moseley Collins
(See Rufo v. [read post]
Sacramento Car Accident Lawyer Blog - http://www.sacramentocaraccidentlawyerblog.com/
Tort Reform “Policy”: Injury Plaintiffs Should Always Lose
7 Aug 2012, 4:10 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Rufo v. [read post]
Litigation and Trial - Max Kennerly - http://www.litigationandtrial.com/