Search for: "Ruiz v. Affinity Logistics Corp."
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2012, 9:09 am
Affinity Logistics Corp., No. 10-55581, 2012 U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:45 pm
Ruiz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
The Ninth Circuit has not been kind to S.D. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Affinity Logistics Corp., Case No. 12-56589 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
Affinity Logistics Corp., (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:00 am
Indeed, as noted in a recent case, Ruiz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:39 am
Affinity Logistics Corp., Case No. 12-56589 (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:00 am
Indeed, as noted in a recent case, Ruiz v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
Affinity Logistics Corp., 2012 WL 388171 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:46 am
Finding the facts here quite similar to the plaintiffs in Estrada v FedEx Ground Package Sys, in which a state appeals court held drivers were employees under state law, the Ninth Circuit reinstated the drivers’ state-law causes of action alleging failure to pay sick leave and other wage-related claims (Ruiz v Affinity Logistics Corp, June 16, 2014, Pregerson, H). [read post]