Search for: "Runner v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc."
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2009, 4:23 am
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Later in the decade, the pendulum swung toward a more liberal view of the Scaffold Law in Runner v New York Stock Exchange Inc. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:43 pm
New York Stock Exchange, Inc., — N.E.2d —-, 2009 WL 4840213 (decided December 17, 2009), the worker did not fall. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:18 am
The record fails to provide any explanation sufficient to relate the injury sustained to the operation of the force of gravity (see Runner v New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 13 NY3d 599 [2009], supra). [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:55 am
" Given recent New York Court of Appeals decisions in construction accident cases involving Section 240(1), see, Runner v New York Stock Exchange, Inc., NY3d, 2009 WL 4840213, 2009 NY Slip Op 09310, 2009, it is submitted that the pendulum has swung back, i.e. an object at a construction site falls from a height plaintiff wins. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
New York Stock Exchange Inc. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:22 am
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (13 N.Y.3d 599 [2009]), i.e. whether the activity at issue was covered under the statute and whether the harm caused to the plaintiff flowed directly from the application of the force of gravity. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:21 pm
New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 13 N.Y.3d 599, 895 N.Y.S.2d 279, 922 N.E.2d 865 (2009). [read post]
