Search for: "Rupert v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
United States, in which the state has asked the Court to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision blocking enforcement of four provisions of S.B. 1070, its controversial immigration law. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
Specifically the Court summarized and applied the law as follows: [38] The obligation of the Ruperts under the Tenancy Agreement was to “maintain the residential property in a reasonable state of …. decoration and repair. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am
Christopher Hutcheson (formerly known as KGM) v News Group Newspapers and others [2011] EWCA Civ 808 In these turbulent times for Rupert Murdoch (see the UK Human Rights Blog contempt post) it seems strange to see one of his newspapers being vindicated by the courts, but, for once, The Sun seems to have been on the side of the angels. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:48 am
On 30 July 2021, Saini J handed down judgment on the Defendant’s strike-out application in Warren v DSG Retail Limited [2021] EWHC 2168 (QB). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
Rupert v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:43 pm
Glenn Mulcaire v News Group Newspapers The facts Mr Mulcaire was employed by NGN as a private investigator between 2002 and 2007. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:11 am
Associated Press Arizona State Sen. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:37 am
Barkoff" Rupert M. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:23 am
Can they still do that when the President of the United States has confirmed the records’ existence via tweet? [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
The talented Rupert can create work with his eyes shut. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:54 am
Perhaps both sides over-state their case. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am
” The judgment states that “[i]t would therefore be little short of a breach of faith for the judiciary not to give effect to the 10% increase in damages recommended by Sir Rupert“. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:32 am
Blame Rupert Murdoch. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:57 pm
The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
