Search for: "Rural Telephone Service Co. v. Feist Publications" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Rural Telephone Service Co, Inc. provides that a work only requires a “modicum of creativity” to be considered “original. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:57 am by Ben
As was decided some time ago in Feist Publications, Inc. v Rural Telephone Service Co., compilations can be protected even if they only contain ideas if "... [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:14 am
As was decided some time ago in Feist Publications, Inc. v Rural Telephone Service Co., compilations can be protected even if they only contain ideas if "... [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
The originality standard is a minimal degree of creativity as stipulated in Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:41 am by Terry Hart
Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 US 340, 345 (1991).H.R.Rep. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
In the seminal copyright case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:18 am by Matthew Hickey
Rural Telephone Service Co. which rejected the possibility of granting copyright on the basis of effort alone. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:40 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)(“[N]o author may copyright facts or ideas. [read post]