Search for: "Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc. v. Feist Publications, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2016, 10:39 am
In the United States, there is, of course Feist Publication, Inc. v Rural Telephone Service Company, on telephone directories, and Victor Lalli Enterprises, Inc. v Big Red Apple, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm by Courtney Minick
The leading case in compilation analysis is Feist Publications Inc v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:25 am
Following the US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)), the term “original” entails two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:03 pm
First, the Board considered Feist Publications, Inc., v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:23 am
Here is the abstract: In the 1991 case of Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
 Original works of authorship The Review Board set out that its decision was based on the “low standard of copyrightability” set out in Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Co., (499 U.S. 340 (1991), requiring a “minimal creative spark”). [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Holly
Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [4] See Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]