Search for: "Russell, Jr. v. The State Of New York et al" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2016, 6:44 am by Kelly Hyman
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. et al. ( No. 7:16-cv-00270) from the Southern District of New York; Steve Okstad et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 6:44 am by Kelly Hyman
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. et al. ( No. 7:16-cv-00270) from the Southern District of New York; Steve Okstad et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
[et al.].New York : Russell Sage Foundation, c2010. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
" Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (10th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionRespondents' supplemental briefPetitioner's supplemental briefAmicus brief of the National Congress of American IndiansPetitioner's replyCVSG Information:Invited: February 22, 2011Filed: May 27, 2011 (Deny) Title: City of New York v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hoffman, of course, had a core argument of considerable merit, in Kiobel, et al., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
 And he had a new work, a three-volume set with a long title: Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, Before the Adoption of the Constitution. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
Section III then develops the more important characteristics of this new dynamic and permeable constitutional framework. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
Section III then develops the more important characteristics of this new dynamic and permeable constitutional framework. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
  This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
” In 2003, in the case of McConnell, et al., v. [read post]