Search for: "Russell v. Carroll"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2017, 9:22 pm
Michael Carroll, American University Washington College of Law, with a panel consisting of Paul Hughes of Mayer Brown, Counsel for Petitioner; and Ariel Lavinbuk of Robins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP,... [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
Briefly: Richard Re of Re’s Judicata has the second part of his discussion of the relationship between circuit precedent and qualified immunity in the wake of last week’s summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the relationship between circuit precedent and qualified immunity in the wake of last week’s summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:13 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
See Carroll v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 11:46 am
Stan V. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog notes that with the Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 4:59 am
Russell, 06-5306 This, along with the previous grant, smells like rank docket-filler. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Police officer removed from his position following his conviction of a crime involving conduct in violation of his oath of office - Feola v Carroll Power of the arbitrator - Buffalo Teachers Federation Inc. v Board Of Education of City School District of City of Buffalo Probationary employee’s probationary period extended by absences - Ian Garnes v Kelly Probationary employee’s right to a pre-termination… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Relists Carroll v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Relists Carroll v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Relists Carroll v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Russell, for AGAR Corporation, Inc., Petitioner. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Relists Carroll v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The County Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and may act only as provided by the New York Constitution or by act of the Legislature within the limitations of the Constitution (see NY Const, art VI, § 11; Judiciary Law § 190; Matter of Russell v Clute, 222 AD2d 980 [3d Dept 1995]; People ex rel. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Carroll v. [read post]
