Search for: "Russell v. Estate of Russell"
Results 41 - 60
of 341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2020, 6:39 am
“[C]ourts will presume a spouse who placed non-marital property in joint tenancy with the other spouse intended to make a gift to the marital estate” Berger v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 5:23 am
” Zito v. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
This is almost always real estate. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
” In re Marriage of Wojcicki, 440 NE 2d 1028 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1982 “This presumption of transmutation may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that no gift to the marital estate was intended” Zito v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 5:48 pm
NOTICE TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS To: [Address of opposing attorney or party] Pursuant to Rule 214 of the Illinois Supreme Court Rules, the Petitioner, [Your Name] by and through their attorney, Russell Knight, hereby requests the Respondent, [Name of your spouse] to produce within twenty-eight (28) days, at [you or your lawyer’s address] for inspection and copying, the document listed on the attached Rider. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm
” Zagorski v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 5:03 am
” Miller v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 6:04 pm
” Miller v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:47 am
Wilson v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:14 am
Okada v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 7:04 am
From Ford v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 4:16 pm
” Blisset v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:09 am
App. 1990); Russell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
You will ask to receive your equitable share of the marital estate. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
You will ask to receive your equitable share of the marital estate. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:14 am
Messenger v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:14 am
Messenger v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
As they pointed out, just a few years earlier, in Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
” At the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky writes that upcoming abortion case June Medical Services v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 5:00 pm
The will-maker must be aware of the magnitude of the residue of her estate and must “appreciate the effect” of the disposition of her estate: Russell v. [read post]
