Search for: "Russell v. Howe" Results 1 - 20 of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2019, 9:59 am by SCOTUStalk
In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Tom Goldstein and Kevin Russell join Amy Howe of Howe on the Court to discuss the Supreme Court’s announcement that it will weigh in next term on whether federal employment discrimination laws protect LGBT employees in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 8:32 am
Today Howe & Russell filed the petitioner’s brief in Jerman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:29 am
Russell (Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 6:08 am by SCOTUStalk
: Amy Howe and Kevin Russell discuss oral arguments in LGBT employment discrimination cases appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:50 pm
Today the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, along with Akin Gump and Howe & Russell, filed this cert. petition in Burkey v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:26 am
Today the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, along with Akin Gump and Howe & Russell, is filing this cert. petition in Daniels v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:38 pm
Last week, Howe & Russell, in conjunction with the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Clinic and local counsel, filed a supplemental brief in AT&T v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:12 pm
  [Disclosure:   Amy Howe of Howe & Russell and Tom Goldstein of Akin Gump filed amicus briefs in support of petitioners at both the cert. and merits stages. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm by Kirk Jenkins
On Thursday morning, the Illinois Supreme Court filed its decision in Russell v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 7:46 am by Katie Bart
Eric Citron of Goldstein & Russell and Nelson Tebbe of Cornell Law School will lead a discussion for law school students on possible outcomes and how the case may fit in to the Supreme Court’s religious freedom jurisprudence. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
  Please note that Josh worked on the merits briefing for petitioner as a summer associate at Howe & Russell. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 11:17 am
The following is by Amy Howe, partner at Howe & Russell. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:14 am
Today Howe & Russell, in conjunction with the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic and local co-counsel, is filing this supplemental brief in AT&T v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:07 am
  Please note that Howe & Russell represents petitioner. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:05 pm
Quarterman (07-6984) in conjunction with the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Howe & Russell, and Akin Gump’s office in Dallas. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 11:11 am by Kalvis Golde
Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell and John Duffy of the University of Virginia School of Law led a discussion for undergraduate students on how the case relates to trademarks in marketing and advertising. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:43 am
Today Howe & Russell is filing this cert. reply brief in No. 08-1200, Jerman v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:23 am
Please note that Howe & Russell and the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic represented respondents, and Kevin Russell argued the case before the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:15 am by Kevin Russell
DISCLOSURE: Howe & Russell and Akin Gump represented the petitioner in this case. [read post]