Search for: "Russell v. Place"
Results 1 - 20
of 879
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
In a guest post, Russell Sandberg is critical of the recent judgment in Michaela School… The media reports of the last few months highlight how controversial and charged the decision in R (on the Application of TTT) v Michaela School [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin) is. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
On 20 to 22 March 2024, a three-day hearing took place before Fancourt J in the High Court to determine whether the claimants in the NGN unlawful information gathering case would be granted permission to amend their claim. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
The Committee typically met 2-4 times yearly and was apparently content, until the pandemic struck, to continue in place with rules dating from the Victorian era (though in fairness to Committee Members and per Justice Brown, six ‘tweaks’ had been made since 1881[29]). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Russell B. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
I'd love to get feedback on the list, and I think your readership is the best place to get that feedback. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:03 am
, McGrew v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 3:03 pm
See, e.g., McGrew v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
But the result of standard shifting under both M&F Worldwide and Corwin would be the same: Challenged transactions would be placed beyond equitable review of the court. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:55 am
And finally…I Russell Sandberg offers a very different take on a sixtieth anniversary: Why Law Students Should Watch Doctor Who. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On the same day, a hearing took place before Nicklin J in the case of BBG v Persons Unknown. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
The announcement reminds organisations to reflect on their legal obligations and the rights of their employees before implementing work-place monitoring. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:39 pm
” Etc.In the 1969 case of Powell v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 7:21 am
The better solution is to fight the order of protection issuance in the first place. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Russell Sandberg noted the judgment here. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am
: on two significant decisions on the legal recognition of same-sex couples: Buhuceanu and Others v Romania and Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:02 am
Div. 2d Dep't 2015) (statements characterizing plaintiff's written matter as "racist writings" are non-actionable opinion); Russell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:04 am
” when establishing intent (see: R v Vaillancourt, 1987 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 636)). [read post]
