Search for: "Russell v. Williams" Results 101 - 120 of 503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm by Sandy Levinson
9:00am-10:45amChair: William Forbath (Texas)Samuel Issacharoff (NYU)Scot Peterson (Oxford)Mark Tushnet (Harvard)Mila Versteeg (Virginia) Session VI: Constitutional Replacement by Constitutional Amendment11:00am-12:45pmChair: Sergio Verdugo (Universidad del Desarrollo – Chile)Carlos Bernal (Constitutional Court of Colombia)John Dinan (Wake Forest)Rosalind Dixon (Australia, University of New South Wales)Sanford Levinson (Texas) [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Carnegie Endowment President William J. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:50 am by Brandon Harter
On the eve of Thanksgiving the Pennsylvania Supreme Court released its decision in Dittman v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 8:42 am by scanner1
Russell DA 18-0108 2018 MT 227N Criminal – Justice Court Appeal State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 6:12 am
(Delaware Supreme Court and Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, September 12, 2018 Tags: Campaign finance, Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm by Adam Feldman
-area firm Goldstein & Russell (who is the publisher of SCOTUSblog). [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow report that Kavanaugh’s speech “celebrat[ing] his ‘first judicial hero,’ the late Chief Justice William H. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Understanding the ADA, William Goren notes that the court’s opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am by Daniel Hemel
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in Wayfair. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams maintains that “[r]egardless of what Congress and the States do with sports gaming” after the court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]