Search for: "Russian Recovery Fund Limited v. United States"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
According to the Act, approximately $300 billion in Russian sovereign assets have been immobilized worldwide, with approximately $4 to $5 billion of those assets subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.2 Over the past year, there have been increasing calls to make those assets available to Ukraine to support its reconstruction and recovery efforts. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:26 pm
Other alleged acts involved entities and property in the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Otherwise, we have not yet had a truly uniform statute of limitations throughout the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:59 am
Even when these legal theories are “successful,” the creditor is typically only able to salvage a limited recovery against part of a debtor’s protected assets. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
United States, No. 1:17-cv-2487 (KBJ) (D.D.C. 2019) (memorandum opinion) Guam v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 7:56 am
In these talks, Biden made clear that certain critical infrastructure should be off limits to cyberattacks and further reiterated that the United States “would take action to hold cybercriminals accountable. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
These efforts aided in the recovery of millions in misspent funds. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:40 pm
GM assures that there was no "political meddling" in its choice, according to the Wall Street Journal.Sale to be Funded by Government Loans; Saturn Likely to be LiquidatedThe sale will be funded by loans from the governments of the United States, Canada and the City of Ontario (Decision, 14). [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Jan. 21, 2009)(Unpub)>Affirming dismissal of Russian DHHS staff scientist's NO + retaliation claims* McNeal v. [read post]
