Search for: "Rutan v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2007, 8:54 am
" NFP civil opinions today (1): Milton Rutan, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:47 pm by Deborah Hammonds
Supreme Court in Rutan v Republican Party of Illinois (497 U.S. 62 (1990) do not apply. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
Among the significant cases addressing this issue are Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347; Branti v Finkel, 445 US 507 and Rutan v Republican Party of Illi­nois, 497 US 62.* Although the decision does not address Miller’s probationary obligation, "probationary employees" in fact hold permanent appointments and may enjoy limited tenure rights. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm by Erin Miller
During the term when I clerked for Stevens, Rutan v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:15 am
In addition, he filed claims against the individual defendants under the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act and a claim against the Town under the Massachusetts Whistleblower Act.In addressing the merits of Welch's claims the court said:In Rutan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am by Eugene Volokh
(Just as decisions not to hire employees based on political affiliation are subject to the same First Amendment standards as decisions to fire employees based on political affiliation, Rutan v. [read post]